Let's look at the advantages and disadvantages of rental and built-in file site
Let's look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.
Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.
Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.
The rental type gets the benefit of having a server on idc, so that it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.
However, you will need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.
웹하드 순위 There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.
Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to create services, freeing up capacity and traffic.
It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard isn't just a Webhard, it's a company.
It is because it is confidential and knows the energy of strategic sharing and well-managed data.
Link hard solutions have emerged in line with the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without any burden.
It does not need to purchase H/W separately, and the solution alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had a website or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.
OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.
By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage plus the Webhard's original function, the idea of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the answer.
The price is also from 300,000 won for 30 people, which is often fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will undoubtedly be solved a lot.
It is now necessary for Soho to establish a web hard system.
Rental vs. Construction.
Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Internet service that allows you to download files over the Internet at a fixed monthly cost. Which means that using web hard is becoming common.
But it's not just recently that this concept arrived, and it's true that it is been a long time. As soon as it came out, lots of people used it, and there were many workers in offices who didn't join it or even paid for their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.
The biggest background of this phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are many burdens and inconveniences to pay monthly expenses based on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which is why the company refuses to adopt it.
In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet up with the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating-system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses in line with the number of users), which is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.
NAS supplies a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly reduce the needs of these webhard users. Webhard is quite innovative since it supports uploading files by default. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.
Unfortunately, there are functional limitations as the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a higher cost. Consequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it's a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very useful solution that's significantly less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.
Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the right one based on the reality and needs.